 |
Department
Ranticles: Mind Bending
By Canticle
I've avoided commenting on the
Pat Robertson issue because it's just so blatantly stupid. But on it goes, and
takes on an even more circus-like atmosphere, and I find it unavoidable.
Were he an Islamic preacher, calling for the assassination
of President Bush, he would be deported, disappeared to Guantanamo, arrested,
or at the least censured. But as a loyal confidant of the President, a man who
is brought to the White House on the eve of war, he's a 'private citizen
entitled to his opinion.' He is a man now comparing Hugo Chavez to Hitler and
Saddam Hussein.
The simple fact is, Hugo Chavez despises the Bush Regime as
millions worldwide do. He's more than a little paranoid, to be sure, but when
you've got a nuclear nation whose leader talks about his divinely inspired
mission to spread US branded democracy and freedom and is willing to lie to
allies, go back on treaties signed in good faith, deport citizens of other
nations to be tortured without due process or recourse, and generally behave as
one would expect of a banana republic despot, I'd say his paranoia is more than
a little well founded.
Never mind the fact the Bush Regime has already tacitly
supported one failed attempt at his violent overthrow. For Rumsfeld to then
comment that 'to assassinate someone would be illegal, and we don't do that' is
absurd in the extreme. Maybe the adherents of Fox Television still buy that
tripe, stuck as they are before their altar with a patriotic IV, but the world
sees it for what it is, the patently false statements of a regime that feels it
can do what it wants, when it wants, to who it wants.
Is Hugo Chavez a dictator? He's no democrat, but he's hardly
a despot. Americans may not like this little fact, but the vast majority of
Venezuelans are desperately poor in a nation swimming in oil, and Hugo Chavez
was elected by those Venezuelans to bring them out of that poverty. And so far,
he's been succeeding. Oh, it's upset a lot of people, sometimes violently so.
The upper class in Venezuela is not happy. But they had their chance, three
times now, to oust him in elections and the simple fact is there aren't enough
rich people in the country to do it democratically. So now his reforms, aimed
directly at improving the lot of the impoverished, are causing the small middle
and upper class some discomfort. Sorry folks, your actions caused a LOT of
discomfort to your nation over the years, and now that someone's trying to put
a little equality into the picture, you're banging pots and pans and calling
for revolution.
Is Hugo Chavez a good man? I think he's done some pretty
dumb ass things. I think some of his blindingly stupid decisions should be
rescinded or done away with. As a leader, I think he's only moderately worth
the title. His rhetoric, rather than being inclusive to Venezuelans, emphasizes
the divide between rich and poor (and while it is wide, he could at least
acknowledge the middle and upper class as having merit). Rather than promote
unity in his country, he'd rather pander to his base while ignoring his
critics. Of course, all of that applies to President Bush as well.
Economically, Venezuela's historical dependence on oil revenue continues, and
while that's not necessarily a bad thing with oil being where it is today, an
economy dependent on one product is not sustainable.
He also takes phone calls from citizens on a TV show and has
faced criticism on that show. Try to imagine that smirking chimp in the White
House fielding calls from the populace. He has been responsible for starting
massive literacy programs that have been praised by the World Health
Organization (and predictably condemned by the middle and upper class in
Venezuela, which makes sense when you consider that 60% of Venezuela's
population lives in abject poverty). He has initiated a program to try and make
Venezuela self sufficient in food production through micro loans to small,
local producers.
In short, he's trying to improve the lot of life of people
in his nation while protecting them from what he sees as external threats. That
puts him light years ahead of President George W. Bush. The real threat Hugo
Chavez poses to the US is if he succeeds. It would demonstrate to the world
that there are alternatives to the spend yourself into a hole and pray no one
ever tries to collect on what they are owed economic policies of the United
States. Do I think he'll succeed? Probably not, nations require leaders who
unify, not divide. That doesn't mean I don't think the attempt shouldn't be
made. And Venezuela is a democracy, whatever the Bush Regime might say
otherwise. If a majority of Venezuelans want Chavez gone, he'll be gone. They
don't need the United States or its religious zealots to tell them what to do.
Canticle on August 24, 2005.
|
 |